Present: J. Acker, D. Armstrong, S. Chaiken, H. Charalambous,
R. Collier, F. Cornet, S. Faerman, D. Farr, S. Friedman, R. Gibson,
R. Hoyt, M. Jerison, S.B. Kim, W. Lanford, S. Lubensky, A. Lyons,
C. MacDonald, S. Maloney, G. Marschke, T. Maxwell, D. McCaffrey,
G. Moore, J. Mumpower, C. Pearce, J. Pipkin, M. Pryse, R. M. Range,
J. Rudolph, C. Santiago, J. Savitt, H. Scheck, L. Schell, D. Shub,
G. Spitze, S. Turner, T. Turner, J. Uppal, L. Videka, D. Wagner,
Guests: J. Bartow, R. Farrell, M. Hill, K. Lowery, S. Mahan
Minutes: The minutes of February 9, 2004 were approved.
President’s Report: Presented by Carlos E. Santiago, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
University Faculty Senate Report: Presented by Senator Collier: no report.
Chair’s Report: Presented by Professor Marjorie Pryse.
CPCA – Professor Glenna Spitze, Chair: no report.
EPC – Professor Edelgard Wulfert, Chair: presented by Chair Pryse. EPC will introduce two bills on March 15th, and it will be meeting with the Provost for the collection of answers regarding the proposed College of Nanosciences.
GAC – Professor Hara Charalambous, Chair: GAC is discussing the change in the policy of submission of electronic theses and dissertations.
UAC – Joan Savitt, Chair:
RES - Professor Lynn Videka, Chair: RES is reviewing nominations for the Excellence in Research Award. RES has begun to discuss nanotechnology research and safety concerns that were raised at a previous Senate meeting.
LISC - Professor David Wagner, Chair: LISC is discussing two resolutions that have not been officially assigned to LISC. In fact, they are from two different institutions. The first is regarding subscriptions and refusing institutions the ability to subscribe to any numbers smaller than their contract requires. Many institutions have been passing resolutions and some have refused to negotiate with Elsevier at all. That issue has been delegated to the LISC Library Subcommittee. The second resolution is basically that there have been requests that the University implement a policy of the use of Open Source software, except where it is absolutely not able to do so. That issue has been forwarded to the Information Technology Uses and Policy subcommittee of LISC
CAFE – Professor Donna Armstrong, Chair: CAFE had its second meeting on the Patriot Act, which was specific to surveillance implications, there are two more meetings planned on issues with the Patriot Act. Also, an ad hoc committee of CAFE is working on a bill for freedom of expression on campus. Professor Armstrong was contacted by the Chair and Co-Chair of the Action Committee of the Student Senate regarding the return of the Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) to the campus, which is scheduled for March 22, 2004. There is considerable concern with undergraduates about this exhibit. She did meet with two student senators and tried to pass on to them some of the awareness that CAFE gained about freedom of speech; CAFE will attempt to conduct a forum on freedom of speech prior to the return of GAP on March 22nd.
ULC – Professor Gwendolyn Moore, Chair: Three representatives
from the Muslim Student Association presented a proposal asking the campus to
suspend classes for two Muslim holy days. They made the case that Muslim students
can only get permission to miss classes from the Dean of Undergraduate Studies
and this procedure makes them feel uncomfortable and singled out. They put together
a strong argument and do have support from on and off campus officials. ULC
has set up a committee to further investigate this matter
CERS – Senate Chair Pryse announced that CERS has not yet met this year.
Governance Committee Report: Professor Andi Lyons, Chair: The Governance Committee received several nominations for professional staff for next year’s Senate, there have been 11 nominations received for two or three slots. There is a need for a few more nominations to fill the slate for the part-time faculty Senators. The slate for Secretary and Vice Chair will close on March 5, 2004, that election will take place at the March 15th Senate meeting.
Professor MacDonald announced that the University Council met and it has approved, with minor changes, a new community rights and responsibilities document. The Council accepted a recommendation that in the future it be sent to the University Senate for advice in its three-year cycle of revision. There was also a resolution supporting working with all constituencies regarding bringing forward the new proposed College of Nanotechnology.
Senate Bill No. 0304-11: Revisions of the Undergraduate English Major, introduced by UAC. Professor Savitt introduced and discussed the bill on behalf of UAC.
Bill No. 0304-11, Revisions of the Undergraduate English Major passed unanimously.
Senate Bill No. 0304-12: Revision of “Oral Discourse” General Education Criteria, introduced by UAC. Professor Savitt introduced and discussed the bill on behalf of UAC.
Bill No. 0304-12, Revision of “Oral Discourse” General Education Criteria passed unanimously.
Senate Bill No. 0304-13: ROTC and Applied Elective Credit, introduced by UAC. Professor Savitt introduced and discussed the bill on behalf of UAC. There was some discussion on clarifying what the category of applied credit is and Professor Savitt referred to the second page of the bill, which cannot be amended on the floor at this time.
Bill No. 0304-13, ROTC and Applied Elective Credit passed unanimously, and the issue of clarification of applied credit will be discussed further in UAC.
Senate Bill No. 0304-14: Revision of Undergraduate Admissions Policies, introduced by UAC. Professor Savitt introduced and discussed the bill on behalf of UAC. The classification of “admit with consideration” is for internal purposes only. There was a “friendly suggestion” that was accepted by UAC, it referred to page four, section A (iii), the second sentence should read “The criteria for evaluation of college transcripts will be determined…” Another suggestion was on page six, the last paragraph should somehow indicate the length of time a degree program will take to complete. There was extensive discussion on transferability and timing of completing programs. UAC will look at both issues separately.
Bill No. 0304-14, Revision of Undergraduate Admissions Policies passed unanimously with the amendment to page four.
Senate Bill No. 0304-15: Administrative Support for the University Senate, introduced by the Governance Subcommittee. Professor Andi Lyons introduced the bill. Discussion on the bill included a proposal to amend it to read “one course per academic year” rather than one course per semester, or to reduce teaching time by a certain percentage. After lengthy discussion, there was a call to vote on an amendment to the bill to change it from one course per semester to one course per year. There were six in favor, fourteen opposed, and seven abstained. The amendment was defeated, and discussion returned to the bill itself. Further discussion included the importance of the position, and allowing the chair more committed time to prepare for the Senate.
Bill No. 0304-15: Administrative Support for the University Senate passed eighteen to three with seven abstentions.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
Jayne VanDenburgh, Recorder