• Antonio, Michael E. (2003). "Arbitrariness and the Death Penalty: The Impact of Psychological Factors at Three Decision Points during the Capital Trial." (Law, Policy and Society, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts).
  • Barner, John R. (2011). “Life or death decisions: Measuring jury instruction impact on imposition of the death penalty” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia).
  • Brewer, T. W. (2003). "Don't kill my friend: The attorney-client relationship in capital cases and its effect on jury receptivity to mitigation evidence." (Doctoral Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York, 2003) Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(2), 631.
  • Connell, Nadine M. (2006). "Does the Group Make a Difference? A Look at the Factors that Impact Perceptions of Group Deliberations and Sentencing Outcomes in Capital Trials." (University of Maryland, College Park).
  • Denver, Megan (2009). "Are Capital Jurors Willing To Serve Again? Investigating Race And Perceptions Of Procedural Fairness In The Deliberation Room." (Master's Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware).
  • Edelman, Bryan (2003). "Misguided Discretion: A Dual Process Model of Juror and Jury Sentencing in Capital Trials." (School of Social Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada).
  • Flores, David M. (2010). “Mechanisms of moral disengagement in capital juror decision making: An empirical examination.” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno)
  • Girgenti, Alicia A. (2014) "The Intersection of Victim Race and Gender in Death Penalty Cases." School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University
  • Goetz, Julie (1995). "The Decision-Making of Capital Jurors in Florida: The Role of Extralegal Factors." (School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida).
  • King, Lisa (2002). "Juror Empathy for the Defendant." (Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee).
  • Jochnowitz, Leona D. (2014) Receptivity of Capital Jurors to Mitigating Factors of Mental Illness, Retardation, and Situational Impairments (EMED) in Death Penalty Decisions; The Capital trial Analyzed as a Mitigating Weight and "Counterweight" to Premature Decisions and Pro-Death Bias, (University at Albany, State University of New York), Doctoral Dissertation in Progress.
  • Kleinstuber, Ross. (2007). The Effect of Religious Affiliation on Capital Jurors Punitive Beliefs and Dispositions Toward Punishment (Master's Thesis, University of Delaware).
  • Kleinstuber, Ross. (2011). Everyone Has Choices: Constructing Individualism in the Cultural and Institutional Life of Capital Mitigation (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware).
  • Kowaluk, Gary John. (2010). “The strategy and performance of defense counsel in capital trials: The influence of capital defense attorneys on juror voting decisions.” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri, Kansas City).
  • Lanier, Charles S. (2004). "The Role of Experts and Other Witnesses in Capital Penalty Hearings: The Views of Jurors Charged With Determining The Simple Sentence of Death" (School of Criminal Justice, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York).
  • Pruss, Heather. (2014). "The Role of Juror and Jury Gender during Capital Deliberations: A Guided Qualitative Analysis." (Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University).
  • Steiner, Benjamin D. (1999). "Race, Ideology, and Legal Action: The Case of Capital Sentencing." (Department of Sociology, Northeastern University, Boston Massachusetts).
  • Trahan, Adam. (2009). “Don’t shoot the messenger: Capital jurors’ perceptions of attorneys.” (Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University).
  • Vartkessian, Elizabeth S. (2011) “Fatal Distraction: Does the Texas Capital Sentencing Statute Discourage the Consideration of Mitigating Evidence?” (Doctoral Dissertation Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom).