The NYC Teachers’ Retirement System, Fiscal Issues and Risks

The NYC Teachers’ Retirement System, Fiscal Issues and Risks

teacher

ALBANY, N.Y. (June 3, 2020) — In collaboration with the NYU Marron Institute of Urban Management and funded by the Equable Institute, Donald J. Boyd, Gang Chen, and Yimeng Yin of Rockefeller College’s Project on State and Local Government Finance (SLGF) recently published a research report on the fiscal issues and risks in New York City’s Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) — the second largest of New York City’s five major retirement systems.

With city contributions totaling $3.7 billion in 2018, or six percent of tax revenue, TRS has two important characteristics that distinguish it from most other public pension plans in the nation, according to the report.

First, like other New York City pension plans, its contribution policy is more conservative than the typical public plan in the sense that city contributions rise relatively rapidly in response to investment shortfalls. This protects the solvency of the pension plan. The trade-off is greater risk to the city budget of sharp contribution increases in short time periods, relative to other commonly used contribution policies.

Second, in addition to their regular retirement benefit, TRS members may contribute to a Tax-Deferred Annuity (TDA) program that offers guaranteed fixed returns backed by the defined benefit pension fund and thus by city taxpayers. The guaranteed rate for most members is seven percent, set by the state legislature. It is well above guaranteed fixed returns that may be purchased in the private market, which are currently 2 to 2.5 percent or less. TDA assets are invested by TRS along with regular defined benefit pension assets. The guarantee provides valuable benefits to plan members but creates special risks to the city. It does not have the constitutional protection that the regular retirement benefit has and therefore is more directly under the control of state and city policymakers.

If TDA assets earn more than the guarantee, the additional earnings accrue to the TRS pension fund, keeping city contributions funded by taxpayers lower than they otherwise might be. If TDA assets earn less than the guarantee, the pension fund must make up the difference, increasing costs to the city and its taxpayers, according to the report, titled “The New York City Teachers’ Retirement System: Fiscal Issues and Risks.”

If TDA assets fall short of the guarantee by 10 percent — for example, if TRS were to lose approximately three percent in a year — then TRS will have to make up the difference. TDA had approximately $25 billion of assets at the end of 2019, so this would mean a guarantee payment of approximately $2.5 billion, ultimately funded by city taxpayers. “City policymakers need to understand the risks that City pension funds create, and make informed decisions about those risks,” said Gang Chen. “Our report provides valuable information designed to help them to understand those risks better.”

The Project on State and Local Government Finance (SLGF) is dedicated to conducting research on fiscal issues in state and local governments in the United States. Its central mission is to produce objective, rigorous, and in-depth analysis to inform and educate policy makers and stakeholders of state and local governments, to help them make better financial management decisions.

Click here to view a full copy of the report.