The Economics of Illegal Drugs - Drug Trafficking
The purpose of this web page is to help people gain a better comprehension of the drug trafficking issue in the United States. As you read, and look at this site, you should understand:
What are the other countries involved in drug trafficking with the U.S.?
Which drugs are most popular and make the most profit?
Supply/Demand of illegal drugs, and their relationship to drug trafficking.
How are the drugs transported?
What is the U.S. Government reaction to drug trafficking, and some solutions?
The economics of illegal drugs
is a complicated concept with many broad ideas and issues.
Illegal drugs are imported and exported over U.S. boarders everyday. Drug
trafficking is a major contributor and the backbone to the economics of illegal
drugs in the United States. When thinking of drug trafficking we need to answer
several important questions. Where
and who are the drugs coming from or going to? Which are the most demanded
drugs, and why? How are the drugs transported and what are the government
reactions/proposed policies to reduce drug trafficking (“The Economic Analysis
of Substance Use and Abuse” [Grossman, 2001])?
Drug trafficking is a major concern of the United States because the
demand for drugs keeps rising and the greater the demand, the greater the supply
imported from the other countries(“Illicit Activity” [MacDonald and Pyle,
2000]).
Drugs are illegal for many
reasons, but the most important reason is that drugs inhibit a person from
making intellectual decisions. Drugs alter the body physically and mentally,
therefore reducing a person’s ability to make the appropriate decisions.
In order to attack these
problems we need to recognize where these drugs are coming from. There are dozens of countries that produce illegal drugs.
The United States primarily imports most of its drugs from Mexico, the
Caribbean, and South America. Generally
speaking the most popular countries appear to be Mexico, Dominican Republic,
Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, and Costa Rica. In
these countries the drugs are mass-produced; these drugs range from marijuana to
cocaine (Fuentes,
Joseph R. & Kelly, Robert J. (1999).
The
habit-forming dependency of the popular illicit drugs, such as cocaine and
heroin is fundamental to the relative elasticity of drug consumerism in the
United States. Demand generates supply and as demand grows, supply
increases despite the successful disruption of trafficking patterns. The
structure of demand and supply is not unique to the drug business. The
demand for drugs in the U.S. has contributed to the growth of the cocaine
business in Colombia,
Peru, and Bolivia. The rise in production not only increases access to new
supply, but also expands the customers’ access to new supply sources, thereby
lowering search costs in the market place and causing prices to fall.
As demand increases, the drug prices rise and businesses become more
profitable as trafficking organizations seek to wring out as much profit as the
market will bear.
Then the United States decided to take another approach, the
government attempted to attack the problem where it originated. This is
where Plan Colombia was derived. We can’t rely on Colombia to stop the
production of illegal drugs, because they don’t really want to stop unless
they can find some type of substitution that will generate as much profit as the
production of illegal drugs. Consequently we can’t rely on these
countries or their armed forces to stop the problem. Therefore we invest
billions of dollars in trying to train the Colombian military to stop these
internal problems. The United
States
Congress authorized the spending of 1.3 billion dollars for Plan Colombia as the
latest front in the U.S. drug war. About 35% of that amount is for
anti-drug operations in Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador. Colombia’s portion
is mostly military aid: 642 million for sixty Black hawk and Huey attack
helicopters, and up to 500 US military advisors, and 300 civilian personnel to
train three counter-narcotics battalions of Colombia’s soldiers. The
remaining 218 million is for alternative development, assistance for displaced
persons, and human rights and judicial reform. This is an example of how
the United States deals with this problem [(Watson, Cynthia A. (1990, 1991)
(Morales, Waltraud, Queise. (1992) (Hayes, M.D.; Foreign (1988,1989)].