“Shortages
of math and science teachers and the feminization: A common
reason” (presented at the annual
conference held by the Society of Labor
Economists in 2009)
Abstract: Two concerns
in US education
are shortages of qualified math and
science teachers and the feminization of teaching. I draw on the
National
Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 to identify a common reason for
the two phenomena.
Controlling for self-selection by a propensity score matching estimator
and the
Heckit, I find that the rigid pay structure for teachers, rather than
the pay
level, appears to generate both problems. Specifically, the returns to
math
skills in non-teaching are twice as high as those in teaching. The
higher
returns to math skills in non-teaching attract individuals with high
math
skills to the non-teaching sector (shortages of qualified math and
science
teachers). An earnings gap, potentially from discrimination, occurs
against
women in non-teaching. Along with this earnings gap, the lower average
math
skills of women than those of men provide women with an incentive to
teach (the
feminization of teaching). These findings imply that if teachers are
paid
commensurate with their math skills, individuals with high math skills
would be
attracted to teaching. The majority of them are expected to be men
considering
their current advantage over women in math.
Abstract: Effective
responses to continual quantitative
and qualitative shortages of teachers require understanding of the
supply of
teachers. One neglected aspect of the supply is a recent increase in
the
proportion of minority teachers. Using the Schools and Staffing Survey
and the
Teacher Follow-up Survey, I estimate the relationship between workgroup
racial
diversity and turnover of white teachers. I find that young white
teachers are
more likely to stay in their original schools when the proportion of
minority
teachers is smaller. However, the opposite pattern emerges for older
teachers.
This poses a policy dilemma for catching two rabbits at one time, i.e.
recruiting and retaining teachers on the one hand and diversifying
teaching
staff on the other hand.
Abstract: The US gender gap
in math
has declined, and the gap, if any, has usually appeared only in
adolescents
over the last several decades. Recently, it has been reported that a
gap appeared
in children. Moreover, the gap widened with advancing grade-levels in
school.
Using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort, I
estimate
the counterfactual distribution of girls’ math scores and measure
the gap for
each quantile. I find that girls at the top of the distribution fall
behind
boys but they catch up to boys later. At the same time, girls in the
lower
parts of the distribution lose ground. In fifth grade, a gap of 0.2 SD
is
observed across the entire distribution. The results demonstrate
important
dynamics of the gap that the mean gap fails to show but that are
relevant for
the purpose of policy.
“The Dynamics of the evolution of the
black-white test score gap”
(presented at an annual conference held by the Southern Economic
Association in 2008)
Abstract: Recently
the black-white test score gap came to a
complete stop and even seemed to start reversing itself after a
vigorous
closing. Relying on the concept of the average treatment effects on the
treated, I apply a quantile version of the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition
to
estimating the counterfactual distribution of the test scores of black
students. From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten
Class of
1998-1999 (ECLS-K), I find that initially the gap appears only at the
top
distribution of test scores. As children age, however, the gap at the
top
shrinks, whereas the gap in the mid-part of the distribution grows.
Moreover
the gap due to differences in the effect, rather than the amount, of
characteristics becomes important. The findings suggest that
researchers look
beyond the mean gap and the amount of characteristics to reduce the
test score
gap.
“The monopsony power in the US teachers
labor market” (2008, Empirical Economics Letters, 7(6),
553-559.)
Abstract: Teacher shortages in the United States have not
been resolved for more than a half century. When shortages
persist in a labor market, monopsony can be one reason. The standard
search
model is used to derive a monopsony measure that is robust to the
assumptions
in the previous literature. Drawing on the Current Population Survey
from 1994
to 2006, I find that the monopsony measure is substantially higher in
the
teacher labor market relative to other comparable labor markets.
Additional evidence
is provided that the monopsony power in the teacher labor market is not
affected by the general economic activities.
“Why
are there singles?: Being single in equilibrium as a partner discipline
device” (2008, Economics Bulletin, 10(10),
1-6.)
Abstract: Although
people constantly search for partners, there are always some ones who
are left
as singles. This paper provides a simple model to demonstrate that this
can
happen even in the environment most conducive to partnership, when
monitoring
infidelity is not perfect. The intuition is that, when having a partner
is
preferred to being single, being single can be used as a discipline
device to
prevent infidelity.
“School
and subject choices in education” (2007, Economics Bulletin, 9(13), 1-7.)
Abstract: Effects of school choice have
not been satisfactorily
resolved empirically and theoretically. I provide a theory of school
choice. I
show that a positive assortative matching between teachers and students
maximizes the production of education. Also the production can be
augmented by
letting students choose subjects that they are good at rather than do
everything.