% LaTeX
\documentclass[leqno]{article}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{gellmu}
\usepackage[margin=100bp,nohead]{geometry}
\setlength{\parskip}{6bp}
\setlength{\parindent}{0bp}
\thispagestyle{empty}
\date{October 22, 1999 \\{} Last re-processing \today{} }
\title{The Idea of a Markup Interface for XML}
%nul
\setlength{\topmargin}{-30bp}
\setlength{\textheight}{696bp}
 %cs0
 %cs0
 %cw0
\newlength{\centerskip}
\setlength{\centerskip}{\topsep}
\newcommand{\hsf}{\hspace*{\fill}}
\newcommand{\tdbc}[1]{\hsf\textbf{#1}\hsf}
\newenvironment{menulist}{
\begin{list}{}{
\setlength{\topsep}{0bp}
\setlength{\labelwidth}{0.03\linewidth}
\setlength{\leftmargin}{0.06\linewidth}
\setlength{\itemindent}{0bp}
\setlength{\itemsep}{-6bp}
\setlength{\parsep}{6bp}}
}{\end{list}}
\newenvironment{Menulist}{
\begin{list}{}{
\setlength{\topsep}{0bp}
\setlength{\labelwidth}{0.03\linewidth}
\setlength{\leftmargin}{0.06\linewidth}
\setlength{\itemindent}{0bp}
\setlength{\itemsep}{3bp}
\setlength{\parsep}{6bp}}
}{\end{list}}
\newenvironment{toclist}{\normalsize
\begin{list}{}{
}}{\end{list}}
\newenvironment{Toclist}{\large
\begin{list}{}{
}}{\end{list}}
\newenvironment{citations}{
\begin{list}{}{
\setlength{\topsep}{0bp}
\setlength{\labelwidth}{0bp}
\setlength{\leftmargin}{0.04\linewidth}
\setlength{\labelsep}{0bp}
\setlength{\itemindent}{-0.2\leftmargin}
\setlength{\itemsep}{3bp}
\setlength{\parsep}{0bp}}
}{\end{list}}
\author{William F. Hammond}
\begin{document}
\begin{center}\LARGE\bfseries{}
The Idea of a Markup Interface for XML
\end{center}
\begin{center}\Large\bfseries{}
\textsl{William F. Hammond}
\end{center}
\begin{center}
\large\bfseries{}
October 22, 1999 \\{} Last re-processing \today{} 
\end{center}

\medskip

\section*{1\ \ \label{SU-1}The Value of a \LaTeX{}-Like Markup User Interface
         for XML}
\par{A markup user interface (\textsc{MUI}) for an \textsc{XML} language
(formally ``\textsc{XML} application'') is a markup language
that admits a well-defined translation to the \textsc{XML} language. \ 
}
\par{Recent discussions in \url{news:comp.text.tex} show that at least
two of us are thinking about \textsc{MUI}s for \LaTeX{}-like \textsc{XML}
languages. \   Jonathan Fine has been working on a \emph{roff}-like
\textsc{MUI} that he calls ``Active TeX'', and I have been
working on a \LaTeX{}-like \textsc{MUI} that I call \textsc{GELLMU}. \ 
}
\par{As I use the acronym \textsc{MUI}, I do intend it to be reminiscent of
the acronym \textsc{GUI} for ``graphical user interface''. \   Both
\textsc{GUI}s and \textsc{MUI}s have the intention of making life easier,
or perhaps at least more familiar, for some authors. \   An \textsc{MUI},
unlike typical \textsc{GUI}s, has the possibility of giving the author
full and rigorous control over content. \ 
}
\par{Furthermore, an \textsc{MUI} in the style of a pre-existing
non-\textsc{XML} markup offers a convenient avenue for prototyping a new
\textsc{XML} language to model the markup practice in the pre-existing
markup. \ 
}
\par{Beyond that, it offers a route for conversion of legacy archives in
the pre-existing markup to \textsc{XML} languages with minimal human
intervention. \ 
}
\par{Please allow me to say a bit more about what I have in mind for
\textsc{GELLMU}. \ 

}

\section*{2\ \ \label{SU-2}The Basic GELLMU Processing Design}
\par{The things that I have on hand, aside from \LaTeX{} are:

\begin{enumerate}

\item  \textsc{GNU} Emacs, version 20. \   (I believe that version 19 is OK.)


\item  James Clark's \texttt{nsgmls}, a part of his \texttt{SP}. \ 

\end{enumerate}
}
\par{My processing set-up is the following:

\begin{description}

\item[{Syntactic translation from \LaTeX{}-like markup to SGML}]
{ My Elisp processor, which can
be run interactively in \textsc{GNU} Emacs or in batch mode, performs
syntactic translation to convert \LaTeX{}-like markup to an \textsc{SGML}
language (formally, application). \   The syntactic translator is largely
ignorant of command names. \   Whatever command names are used become the
names of \textsc{SGML} elements. \   There is a standard way to convert
multiple argument/option sequences. \ 
\par{This processing stage traps syntax errors. \   (It will fail to detect an
even number of missing \texttt{`\$'} characters; but this error will
show in the next stage.)

}
}

\item[{Validating parse of the SGML language}]
{ At the
validation stage the difference between \textsc{SGML} and \textsc{XML} is
significant if one wants to have ``math mode'' be a global
toggle since that may be modeled robustly only using \textsc{SGML}
exclusions. \ 
\par{A validating parse is made using \texttt{nsgmls}. \ 
Of course, the language definition, i.e., \textsc{SGML} application
definition, is crucial. \   It is contained in an \textsc{SGML} declaration
and in an \textsc{SGML} document type definition (\textsc{DTD}). \ 
}
\par{The language definition that I am using is the heart of my personal
production system. \   But I regard it only as didactic in the larger
scheme of things. \   Others will certainly want things that I do not
want. \ 
}
\par{As far as it goes, it models \LaTeX{} rather closely in some ways and
rather loosely in other ways. \   Where it departs from close modeling,
the reason is usually related to having a document structure that is
not print-centric. \ 
}
\par{The validating parse traps errors in language use. \ 

}
}

\item[{Down-translation to XML}]
{ This is done with the program
called \texttt{sx} in the family of \texttt{SP} processors. \ 
\par{While it is possible to recover an equivalent \textsc{SGML} document
from the down-translated \textsc{XML}, it is not possible under the
\textsc{XML} umbrella to have as precise a language definition as
under the wider \textsc{SGML} umbrella. \   That said, either form may
be run through a processor that serves to enforce a tighter language
definition. \ 

}
}

\item[{SGML processing}]
{ This can go anywhere that is sane for the language definition. \ 
One can use any programming language, but it helps to have a basic
\textsc{SGML} library on hand. \   I am using David Megginson's
\texttt{SGMLS.pm}, a Perl 5 library, and its interface
\texttt{sgmlspl}. \ 
\par{In my personal production system I routinely format \textsc{GELLMU}
``articles'' for both \LaTeX{} and \textsc{HTML}. \   Invalid
\textsc{HTML} and error messages from \LaTeX{} represent bugs in my
processors, which I always repair as soon as possible. \   There may be
box size complaints from \TeX{}; they represent authoring content
errors. \   These two formatters work either on the \textsc{SGML} or the
\textsc{XML} version of an article. \ 
}
\par{At present my personal production language definition is not fully
up-to-speed for journal articles nor for translation to
XHTML-with-MathML, but it is serving me well for my classes. \   It gives
me a sane way to have course handouts and web offerings in a
bullet-proof way from a single source. \   At this time I simply cannot
assume that more than about a third of my students have easy access to
\textsc{PDF} readers. \   So I feel constrained to give them simple
\textsc{HTML} with very limited pseudo-TeX for math. \ 
}
\par{Other formattings for \textsc{GELLMU} article that should be possible
include translations to (1) DocBook, (2) TEI, and (3) Texinfo, though
suboptimally so long as math is not available. \   These are not small
jobs, and I may never undertake any of them. \   (Any project that
undertakes to format an \textsc{XML} language in Texinfo should give
serious consideration first to modeling Texinfo as an \textsc{XML}. \ 
It would also be desirable to minimize Info/\TeX{} bifurcation in
XTexinfo and to provide math for XTexinfo.)
}
\par{If a time arrives when I can assume that three-fourths of my students
have out-of-the-box browsers for XHTML-with-MathML, then I should be
able to format the original \textsc{GELLMU} source directly for that ---
if by that time I am not able to squeeze it out of carefully-set
LaTeX-4. \   (I exaggerate somewhat. \   In principle, I need to provide
some math symbol declarations in the sources, and math symbol
declaration handling is not yet present in my set-up.)

}
}
\end{description}

}

\section*{3\ \ \label{SU-3}About this document}
\par{This document was prepared as a \textsc{GELLMU} ``article''. \ 
A copy of the \textsc{HTML} version of this document is available
on the web at
\begin{center}
\url{http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/gellmu/mui/}
\end{center}
along with a full list of anchored versions as follows:
\begin{menulist}

\item  \textsc{GELLMU} source: \url{mui.glm}. \ 

\item  \textsc{SGML}, ``article'' document type: \url{mui.sgml}. \ 

\item  \textsc{XML}, ``article'' document type: \url{mui.xml}. \ 

\item  formatting in \LaTeX{}: \url{mui.ltx}. \ 

\item  \textsc{DVI} made from \LaTeX{}: \url{mui.dvi}. \ 

\item  \textsc{PDF} made from \LaTeX{}: \url{mui.pdf}. \ 

\item  formatting in \textsc{HTML}: \url{mui.html}. \ 
\end{menulist}

}
\end{document}