We study curves of negative self-intersection on algebraic surfaces. Our main result shows there exist smooth complex projective surfaces , related to Hilbert modular surfaces, such that contains reduced, irreducible curves of arbitrarily negative self-intersection . Previously the only known examples of surfaces for which was not bounded below were in positive characteristic, and the general expectation was that no examples could arise over the complex numbers. Indeed, we show that the idea underlying the examples in positive characteristic cannot produce examples over the complex number ﬁeld, and thus our complex examples require a diﬀerent approach.
In recent years there has been a lot of progress in understanding various notions and concepts of positivity . In the present note we go in the opposite direction and study negative curves on complex algebraic surfaces. By a negative curve we will always mean a reduced, irreducible curve with negative self-intersection.
It has been known for a long time that there are algebraic surfaces with inﬁnitely many negative curves, the simplest examples being the projective plane blown up in the base locus of a general elliptic pencil or certain elliptic K3 surfaces. In the ﬁrst example all negative curves have self-intersection , in the second example the self-intersection is . In both cases negative curves are rational and there are no curves with lower self-intersection, i.e., the negativity is bounded from below.
It is natural to wonder whether these examples are indications of general phenomena. For example:
It is well-known [14, Exercise V.1.10] that the ﬁrst question has a negative answer in positive characteristics; however, in the complex setting, a positive answer was expected. According to an old folklore conjecture (mentioned to the second author by M. Artin around 1980 and sometimes referred to as the Bounded Negativity Conjecture; see e.g. [13, Question p. 24], [12, Conjecture 1.2.1], ), the self-intersections of curves on complex surfaces should be bounded below; i.e., for any given surface there should exist a number such that
for all reduced curves on . Our main result (see Theorem 2.8) shows surprisingly that this expectation was too optimistic.
Theorem A. There exists a smooth projective complex surface containing a sequence of negative curves whose self-intersections tend to .
In fact our results in Section 2 provide a whole series of such examples. With Proposition 2.1 we also show that the approach producing examples of surfaces in characteristic does not work over the complex numbers.
It is important to point out that interesting special cases of the bounded negativity conjecture are still open. For example, one consequence of the Segre-Harbourne-Gimigliano-Hirschowitz Conjecture is that the only negative curves on a blow-up of the projective plane at a ﬁnite set of generic points are exceptional curves (i.e., smooth rational curves of self-intersection ). Since our examples do not extend to such surfaces, the bounded negativity conjecture in the case of the projective plane blown up at a ﬁnite set of generic points remains open.
In Section 3 we address the second question above. We show:
Theorem B. For each integer there is a smooth projective complex surface containing inﬁnitely many smooth irreducible curves of self-intersection . When , the genus of the curves may be prescribed.
In view of Theorems A and B one may wonder if there are any circumstances at all for which some sort of boundedness of negativity holds. In Section 4 we ﬁnish the proof of Proposition 2.1 by showing bounded negativity for elliptic surfaces of Euler number 0. We also address question 3 by recalling a result showing that the self-intersections among negative curves of given genus on a surface is bounded below. Finally, in Section 5 we address question 4, by giving a sharp lower bound on the self-intersections of reduced curves, given that the self-intersections of negative curves is bounded below.
Acknowledgement. We would like to thank Jan Hendrik Bruinier, Lawrence Ein, Friedrich Hirzebruch, Annette Huber-Klawitter, Jun-Muk Hwang, Nick Shepherd-Barron and Kang Zuo for useful discussions. This collaboration grew out of interactions during the Oberwolfach mini-workshop “Linear Series on Algebraic Varieties”. We thank the MFO for excellent working conditions. We also thank SFB/TRR 45 for ﬁnancial support for visits among some of us and for the 2009 summer school in Krakow, where some initial consideration of these problems occurred.
In positive characteristic there exist surfaces carrying a sequence of irreducible curves with self-intersection tending to negative inﬁnity (see [14, Exercise V.1.10]). These curves are constructed by taking iterative images of a negative curve under a surjective endomorphism of the surface.
In more detail, the construction goes as follows. Let be a curve of genus deﬁned over an algebraically closed ﬁeld of characteristic , let be the product surface with the diagonal. Furthermore let be the Frobenius homomorphism, deﬁned by taking coordinates of a point on to their -th powers. Then is a surjective endomorphism of . The self-intersections in the sequence of irreducible curves tend to negative inﬁnity.
We start by showing that, by contrast, in characteristic zero it is not possible to construct a sequence of curves with unbounded negativity using endomorphisms as above. In fact we prove an even stronger statement: the existence of a non-trivial surjective endomorphism implies bounded negativity.
for every reduced irreducible curve .
In cases (1) and (2) the assertion is clear as then carries only ﬁnitely many negative curves. In case (3) bounded negativity follows from the adjunction formula (cf. [4, Prop. 3.3.2]). Finally, bounded negativity for elliptic surfaces with Euler number zero will be established in Proposition 4.1. □
Note, however, that there cannot be a uniform bound for surfaces as in the proposition: For every integer there is a toric surface carrying a curve of self-intersection less than . (The surface can be realized as a successive blow-up of at inﬁnitely near points.). Of course the same holds for -bundles.
The above theorem shows that endomorphisms can never lead to inﬁnitely many negative curves. The key idea in the construction of the example whose existence is postulated in Theorem A, is to replace endomorphisms by correspondences. We start towards the proof of Theorem A with some preliminary remarks on Hilbert modular surfaces.
In what follows we adopt the notation from  and  with the exception that we write instead of for the ring of integers of a quadratic real ﬁeld .
Let be a prime number such that . Consider the quadratic real number ﬁeld with ring of integers . Let be the nontrivial element (i.e. the conjugation ). The group operates on (the second cartesian power of the upper half plane) by
The Hilbert modular group operates eﬀectively. The quotient
is called a Hilbert modular surface. This surface is not compact, however, it can be compactiﬁed by adding ﬁnitely many points, called cusps. The resulting surface has ﬁnitely many quotient singularities outside of the cusps, coming from points in in which the modular group has a non-trivial isotropy subgroup. The singularities arising from the cusps can be resolved by cycles of rational curves, giving a diﬀerent compactiﬁcation of . Of course, when computing intersections of compact curves not meeting the cusps, as we will do below, it does not matter which compactiﬁcation one chooses.
On we consider a series of divisors deﬁned as follows: Given a positive integer , we consider the equation
in variables with ﬁxed and satisfying
The set of solutions of equation (1) is -invariant. We denote its image in by . It is either empty or a divisor in . More precisely, we have the following property [17, p. 58].
Thus, if satisﬁes the arithmetic assumptions in the above statement, then is non-empty and does not pass through any cusp of the surface .
If we consider equation (1) under the additional assumption that the triple
i.e., not divisible by any integer , then the set of solutions is denoted by . We have the following characterization due to Franke , see also [16, Satz 1, p. 105].
Proposition 2.3. Let be an integer that is a quadratic residue modulo or divisible by . Then the divisor is reduced and irreducible provided is not divisible by , and it has exactly two components if divides .
If does not satisfy the conditions in the Proposition, then is empty.
The relation between the ’s and ’s is given by the following fundamental equality, see [17, p. 60]:
The following arithmetic function is relevant for computing self-intersections of the curves , see [17, p. 83 (49)]
where the sum is taken over all integers such that and is divisible by . The function appearing in (3) is in turn deﬁned as
see [17, p. 69 (15)], where is the class number function modiﬁed by the following convention:
Furthermore, we follow Hirzebruch and set
Combining Proposition 2.3, equation (2) and Fact 2.2 we have the following result which is crucial for further considerations.
Proposition 2.4. Assume that is not a norm of an ideal in and that it is a quadratic residue modulo which is square-free (in particular not divisible by ), then the curve is compact and irreducible in , hence also in , and we have
Proof. being square-free implies via the decomposition (2) that . The asserted self-intersection formula follows from the intersection formula on [17, p. 83 (50)] together with [17, Theorem 4, p. 87] taking into account that does not pass through any of the cusps. □
Next, we want to show that on (whence on as well) there exists an irreducible curve not passing through any of the cusps with negative self-intersection. To this end we prove ﬁrst the following purely arithmetic fact.
Proof. Property (a) follows unconditionally from the Chebotarev Density Theorem, stating, as a consequence, that the primes that are not quadratic residues modulo have Dirichlet density .
Assuming GRH, property (b) follows from a result of Montgomery [21, Theorem 13.2], since the least primes satisfying (a) are of size . □
We use the primes and in order to show the existence of a negative compact curve on .
Lemma 2.6. Let be as in Lemma 2.5. We set . Then the curve is a negative compact curve on .
Proof. According to formula (5) we have
which is certainly negative. □
Remark 2.7. Of course, in order to prove Theorem A, we do not need to invoke GRH, as it is enough to construct a single example of a surface with an unbounded sequence of negative curves. To this end we take , and . Then and . Moreover in this case is of general type and this is the case for all primes larger than , see [15, p. 76].
We would like to work on a smooth, projective surface. One possibility would be to resolve the singularities of by blowing them up. However, we prefer a diﬀerent approach: instead of blowing up the quotient singularities, we pass to the quotient of an arithmetic subgroup of ﬁnite index of , thus obtaining a new, smooth Hilbert modular surface and a ﬁnite covering , and then we compactify and resolve singularities by cycles of rational curves, called the cusp divisor.
This way we obtain a smooth, projective compactiﬁcation of a new Hilbert modular surface together with a generically ﬁnite, proper, surjective morphism . The idea is then to use Hecke correspondences to produce an inﬁnite and unbounded sequence of negative curves on out of the curve .
In the following we use the convention that a Shimura curve is a compact curve in (equivalently, in staying outside the cusps), or its inverse image in (equivalently, in , where it does not intersect the cusp divisor).
Theorem 2.8. There exist smooth, projective models of compactiﬁed Hilbert modular surfaces together with inﬁnitely many proper smooth Shimura curves such that the self-intersection number tends to as becomes large. Equivalently, the genus goes to inﬁnity.
Proof. Take and as in Lemma 2.6. We ﬁrst pass to a ﬁnite covering which is deﬁned replacing the group by a torsion free subgroup of ﬁnite index, see [2, Sect. 10]. It corresponds to a quotient of the product of two upper-half-planes by the group . In particular, is smooth, since is torsion free.
The non-compact surface can be compactiﬁed by the method of Baily–Borel  using the ﬁnite set of cusps. However, the Baily–Borel compactiﬁcation would still be singular at the cusps. More preferable is to use a toroidal compactiﬁcation of , i.e., a smooth, projective model, where the cusps of are resolved by cycles of rational curves [11, Chap. II].
We denote by the cusp divisor of , i.e., the inverse image of the set of cusps under the resolution. There is an induced generically ﬁnite morphism . By Lemma 2.6, for suitable and , there exist proper Shimura curves inside not intersecting the cusps, and such that the self-intersection is negative. Pulling back the curves via , we obtain negative curves on , which still have negative self-intersection and do not intersect .
We claim that we may assume that each such curve is smooth. This follows at least after replacing by yet another smaller ﬁnite index subgroup. The reason is that is the quotient of a geodesic curve by an arithmetic subgroup of . If we replace by a ﬁnite index subgroup, then also will be replaced by an induced subgroup. Hence, by choosing small enough we can arrange that becomes torsion free, and thus the inverse image of is a smooth Shimura curve. One can ﬁnd smooth Shimura curves on with negative self-intersection in this way.
for all compact curves .
In the following argument we will need that any other smooth Shimura curve in also has negative self-intersection. This follows from and together with Hirzebruch’s proportionality principle (cf. [22, Theorems 0.1 and 0.2 combined]), which states the equality
for every smooth Shimura curve (more generally, it holds for every smooth compactiﬁcation of a modular curve intersecting transversally).
Now we look at the Hecke algebra acting on . It consists of inﬁnitely many correspondences such that the images of any Shimura curve inside consist of unions of other Shimura curves [1, Sect. I.1]. The Hecke correspondences are induced by étale maps [1, Sect. I.1], hence irreducible components of Hecke translates of smooth Shimura curves remain smooth. It is known that the Hecke algebra produces a Zariski dense set of curves from a single , as the action of Hecke operators on a single CM-point is dense in [1, Sect. III (d)], and every Shimura curve contains inﬁnitely many CM-points.
Assume that the irreducible components of all components of all Hecke translates of a given Shimura curve have self-intersection numbers bounded from below. As each is smooth, its self-intersection is a negative multiple of by Hirzebruch’s relative proportionality principle. Therefore – and by adjunction the genus – stays bounded when goes to inﬁnity.
We conclude that the set of all such curves forms a bounded family. However, none of the curves deform since they are all deﬁned over a number ﬁeld (alternatively, since they have negative self-intersection). Hence the well-known boundedness principle implies that the set of all these is ﬁnite. But this contradicts the density of the union of all Hecke translates of , as a ﬁnite set of curves is never Zariski dense. □
The well-known example of blown-up at nine points shows that there are surfaces containing inﬁnitely many -curves. Along similar lines, we point out here that one can exhibit surfaces with inﬁnitely many negative curves of any given (ﬁxed) negative self-intersection and thus prove Theorem B.
Proof. Let be an elliptic curve without complex multiplication, and let be the abelian surface . We denote by and the ﬁbers of the projections and by the diagonal in . It is shown in [6, Proposition 2.3] that every elliptic curve on that is not a translate of or has numerical equivalence class of the form
where and are suitable coprime integers, and conversely, that every such numerical class corresponds to an elliptic curve on . In our construction we will make use of a sequence of such curves, for instance taking for . No two of the curves are then translates of each other.
Fix a positive integer such that . For each of the elliptic curves , the number of -division points on is , and these points are among the -division points of . (Actually, the latter is only true if is a subgroup of , but this can be achieved by using a translate of passing through the origin.) Since the number of -division points on is ﬁnite – there are exactly of them – there must exist a subsequence of having the property that all curves in the subsequence have the same set of -division points, say .
Consider now the blow-up at the set . The proper transform of is then a smooth irreducible curve on with
as claimed. □
For each , the proof above gives a surface with inﬁnitely many curves of genus 1 of self-intersection . This raises the question of whether for each and each there is a surface with inﬁnitely many curves of genus of self-intersection . We now show that the answer is yes at least for :
Proof. Let be a smooth complex projective minimal elliptic surface with section, ﬁbered over a smooth base curve of genus . Then can have no multiple ﬁbers, so that by Kodaira’s well-known result (cf. [3, V,Corollary 12.3]), is a sum of a speciﬁc choice of ﬁbers of the elliptic ﬁbration. Let be any section of the elliptic ﬁbration . By adjunction, .
Take to be rational and to have inﬁnitely many sections; for example, blow up the base points of a general pencil of plane cubics. Then , so that for any section .
Pick any and any . Then, as is well-known , there is a smooth projective curve of genus and a ﬁnite morphism of degree that is not ramiﬁed over points of over which the ﬁbers of are singular. Let be the ﬁber product. Then the projection makes into a minimal elliptic surface, and each section of induces a section of . By the property of the ramiﬁcation of , the surface is smooth and each singular ﬁber of pulls back to isomorphic singular ﬁbers of . Since is the sum of the Euler characteristics of the singular ﬁbers of (cf. e.g. [3, III, Proposition 11.4]), we obtain from Noether’s formula that . Therefore, for any section of , we have ; i.e., has inﬁnitely many smooth irreducible curves of genus and self-intersection . □
It is natural to ask for suitable geometric hypotheses that ensure bounded negativity. We start with a result on elliptic surfaces, needed to ﬁnish the proof of Proposition 2.1.
Proof. Let be an elliptic ﬁbration, where is a smooth curve, and let be the class of a ﬁber of . By the properties of of a ﬁbered surface (cf. [3, III, Proposition 11.4 and Remark 11.5]), the only singular ﬁbers of are possibly multiple ﬁbers, and the reduced ﬁbers are always smooth elliptic curves. In particular, must be minimal and its ﬁbers do not contain negative curves.
Aiming at a contradiction, assume that is a negative curve. Then, by the above, the intersection number is positive. This means that restricts to a map of degree . Taking an embedded resolution of , we get a smooth curve , where the divisor is supported on the exceptional locus of . The Hurwitz formula, applied to the induced covering , yields
where is the ramiﬁcation divisor.
Let denote the multiple ﬁbers of . The assumption implies via Noether’s formula that . Hence
On the other hand,
Consequently, using (6), we obtain
The subsequent lemma yields the contradiction . □
Proof. As is a ﬁnite composition of blow-ups, this can be seen by an elementary inductive argument. For the convenience of the reader we brieﬂy indicate it. Suppose that consists of successive blow-ups. For the assertion is clear, since then is the exceptional divisor , and is the divisor , where is the multiplicity of at the blown-up point. For we may decompose into two maps
One has proper transforms
and the assertion follows by induction. □
In view of Theorems A and B it is not clear if one can reach some sort of boundedness when making additional assumptions on negative curves and on the global geometry of the surface . The ﬁrst general result of this kind known to us is due to Bogomolov. It says that on a surface of general type with curves of a ﬁxed geometric genus lie in a bounded family. This implies of course that their numeric invariants, in particular their self-intersection, are bounded. An eﬀective version of Bogomolov’s result was obtained by Lu and Miyaoka [19, Theorem 1 (1)]. We recall here a statement which is numerically slightly weaker than the result of Lu and Miyaoka but which has a simpler proof (the result is obtained by applying a logarithmic version of the Miyaoka-Yau inequality proved in [4, Appendix]).
Theorem 4.3 (Proposition 3.5.3 of ). Let be a smooth projective complex surface with . Then for every reduced, irreducible curve of geometric genus we have
When asking for bounded negativity of curves, it is necessary to restrict attention to reduced curves. Irreducibility, however, is not an essential hypothesis, since by [4, Proposition 3.8.2], bounded negativity holds for the set of reduced, irreducible curves on a surface if and only if it holds for the set of reduced curves on . Here we improve this result by obtaining a sharp bound on the negativity for reducible curves, given a bound on the negativity for reduced, irreducible curves.
for every reduced curve , where is the Picard number of .
Proof. Consider the Zariski decomposition of the reduced divisor . Then , as is nef and and are orthogonal. So the issue is to bound . The negative part is of the form , where the curves are among the components of and the coeﬃcients are positive rational numbers. Note that for all , because is reduced. Since the intersection matrix of is negative deﬁnite, we have . Thus
as claimed. □
Example 5.2. Here is an example of a surface of higher Picard number, for which equality holds in the inequality that was established above. Consider a smooth Kummer surface with 16 disjoint lines (or with 16 disjoint smooth rational curves of some degree) as in  or in . The generic such surface has , we have , and if is the union of the 16 disjoint curves, then .
Example 5.3. A more elementary example is given by the blow up of at general points, so . Since is ample, it follows by adjunction for any reduced, irreducible curve that , so . But if is the union of the exceptional curves of the blown up points, then .
 Harris, J.: The interpolation problem. Talk delivered at the workshop Classical Algebraic Geometry Today, MSRI, Berkeley, January 26-30, 2009. Available online at the webpage http://jessica2.msri.org/attachments/13549/13549.pdf.
 Hirzebruch, F,: Kurven auf den Hilbertschen Modulﬂächen und Klassenzahlrelationen. in Classiﬁcation of Algebraic Varieties and Compact Complex Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 412, 1974, 75–93.
 Müller-Stach, S., Viehweg, E., Zuo, K.: Relative Proportionality for subvarieties of moduli spaces of K3 and abelian surfaces. Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, Vol 5, Nr. 3, Special Issue: In honor of Friedrich Hirzebruch (2009), 1161–1199.
Thomas Bauer, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße, D-35032 Marburg, Germany.
E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org
Brian Harbourne, Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0130, USA.
E-mail address: email@example.com
Andreas Leopold Knutsen, Department of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Johs. Brunsgt. 12, N-5008 Bergen, Norway.
E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org
Alex Küronya, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Mathematical Institute, Department of Algebra, Pf. 91, H-1521 Budapest, Hungary.
E-mail address: email@example.com
Current address: Alex Küronya, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Mathematisches Institut, Eckerstraße 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan Müller-Stach, Institut für Mathematik (Fachbereich 08) Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Staudingerweg 9 55099 Mainz, Germany.
E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tomasz Szemberg, Instytut Matematyki UP, Podchora̧żych 2, PL-30-084 Kraków, Poland.
E-mail address: email@example.com