Guidelines

Conventions

Computer Science Department

University at Albany

Editing Guidelines

Peer evaluation of student writing assignments can be a mutually beneficial practice. The author benefits from the comments of the editor, knowing that the text has been "field tested" by a peer. The editor benefits from the opportunity to evaluate a classmate's text, learning to read someone else's text critically and, in time, improve the quality of one's own writing. Nevertheless, there are a few guidelines to keep in mind to ensure that peer editing is beneficial and not destructive.

When reading a fellow student's paper, apply the following guidelines:

• Read the whole paper first;

• Think about the theme, the author's purpose, and the author's success in making an effective presentation;

• Form a tentative conclusion;

• Re-read the text.

When editing the paper, use the following conventions:

• Indicate the especially effective sections (whole paragraphs, sentences, choice of words, use of evidence, logical reasoning, whatever) by underlining with a straight line;

• Indicate exceptionally weak or unclear spots (again, sentences, words, reasoning, etc.) by underlining with a wiggly line;

• Leave alone sections that are okay (neither notably strong or weak);

• Circle a misspelled word or any other glaring grammatical mistake;

• Comment briefly on your overall reaction to the paper: state what worked, what didn't. For example, "I liked this point, but I think it needs more evidence to support it." Or "Even though spelling and grammar should be revised, I find your paper convincing, even entertaining."

Remember, be positive. The goal of an editing assignment is to help a peer improve a text and, by doing that, reinforce your own writing style and practice. Paraphrasing a key ethical premise, edit someone else's paper as you want your own edited. (Hint: don't use red ink.)

Edited papers will be returned to me with the revised draft. I will review your comments to check your own diligence and skill as an editor, awarding credit for peer reviews that that effectively assist your peer to write a better paper.

Top of Page

Last updated: 10/1/07