|
Paper
#2
Case
Analysis
Write
a five-to-seven page paper that addresses one of the cases
below.
The competing values
framework provides a dramatic, even elegant, synthesis of roles and
competencies. Unfortunately, limited class time precludes us from analyzing
the many case studies that can enlarge our appreciation of individual
competencies. Let's correct this by examining one of these at greater
length.
Choose one of
the case studies / analyses referred to below and examine it. You can
use
the questions supplied as part of the analyss and/or substitute your
own as your examination warrents. You do not need to repeat the case
study to set the scene for your analysis; neither should you simply
answer the questions and avoid a more integrated discussion of problems
and opportunities.
Refer to either
the latest (fourth) edition or the third edition to find the cases
noted below.
1. Improving Performance
in the Health Care Industry, p. 139 (4th ed.)
2. What's My Job
Design? p. 176 (4th ed.); p. 167 (3rd ed.)
3. Errors in the
Design, p. 186 (4th ed.); p. 176 (3rd ed.)
4. Vision During
Challenging Times, p. 197 (4th ed.); p. 189 (3rd ed.)
5. Designing & Organizing
as a Result of Changing Technology, p. 223 (4th ed.); p. 215 (3rd
ed.)
6. The Case of Michael
Simpson, p. 243 (4th ed.); p. 240 (3rd ed.)
As with the first
paper,
feel free to explore alternatives, make recommendations,
and assess
their
consequences. The questions supplied are usually helpful, but should
not constrain your approach to the topic.
Remember to provide
citations for the organizational situation you are examining if you
refer to other texts besides Quinn et al.
|