The present study will build on my previous empirical testing of the theory of flow by examining how two of the three conditions of flow (goals and challenge) relate to each dimension of the flow experience. This study will provide further evidence for the importance of each dimension and may lead to a revision of the theory if some dimensions do not seem relevant. In addition, the present study will expand on two previous studies that manipulated only one of the flow conditions in each study: the skill-challenge balance (Sackett & Shanock, 2007a) or clear goals (Sackett & Shanock, 2007b). The challenge of a task will be manipulated to create a low, moderate, and high challenge level. In addition, goals will be manipulated to form a no goal, a performance goal, and an experiential goal condition. In my previous work, only one of these conditions (either skill-challenge balance or goals) was used in each study, and only one type of goal was used (performance goal). The present study will help determine whether challenge and goals are necessary conditions of flow, and to shed light on what level of challenge and what type of goals are most influential. In addition, the present study will be able to examine the skill-challenge balance and goals independently and concurrently. The third condition, feedback, will be held constant for the present study.