|
|
Persaud Sisters
Set Their Sights High
By Greta Petry
Michele, 22, Sharlene, 19,
and Alicia Persaud, 18, have their own sister act going on at the University
at Albany. The three sisters are all current students at UAlbany, where
they are making their mark as high achievers.
Michele was 9 when her family
moved from Guyana to the United States; Sharlene was 6 and Alicia, 5. They
made their home in Albany, N.Y.
On this particular morning,
when the mercury in Albany was struggling to inch upward from zero degrees,
Michele recalled one major difference between Guyana and Albany, N.Y. “Guyana
has a tropical climate year-round,” she said, laughing. “It was 85 degrees
there,” added Alicia.
Ask the Persaud sisters to
appear for an interview, and they offer to show up at 8 a.m. They're right
on time, walking so quietly it seemed one person had entered, not
three. And while they have proven to be serious students, they are not
solemn scholars. They share the laughter of close sisters, at times completing
one another's sentences.
“Eloquence best describes
these three Persaud sisters,” said Carson Carr Jr., associate vice president
for Academic Affairs. “They have a hunger for knowledge second to none.
It has been a joy to watch as they grow into accomplished students. I am
so very proud of them.”
Michele, who is expected to
graduate with a master's degree from the School of Public Health in May,
simultaneously completed her senior year at Albany High School and her
freshman year at UAlbany. As an undergraduate, she was a biology major
with a double minor in chemistry and Spanish. She worked in the library,
volunteered at the Middle Earth Peer Assistance Program, Albany Medical
College, and earned a B.S. in 1998.
Upon completing the two-year
master’s program, Michele plans to work in clinical research, data management
and analysis, and is checking into career possibilities with pharmaceutical
companies.
“The best part of my experience
at Albany has been my graduate work with the School of Public Health. The
student body is smaller, everyone knows one another, and the teachers know
you very well. There are a lot of international students and everyone gets
along very well,” said Michele, who works with the New York State Department
of Health as part of her program of study. “That is a unique opportunity
we have at our School of Public Health, to work with county and state public
health departments and do internships or assistantships.”
Last summer Michele completed
a 12-credit internship with the state health department's Bureau of Health
Planning in Troy, and this year she works with Louise-Anne McNutt, an epidemiology
professor in the School of Public Health, analyzing health outcomes for
women who have been victims of partner violence.
Sharlene, a junior, is a Presidential
Scholar and Frederick Douglass Scholar. She developed an interest in becoming
a physician when enrolled in the Science Technology Entry Program (STEP)
at Albany Medical College while still a student at Albany High. She skipped
her senior year to enter UAlbany. Sharlene is considering a career in cardiology,
is preparing for the entrance examinations for medical school, and has
conducted undergraduate research for the past year under the direction
of Professor Rabi Musah of the Department of Chemistry. Sharlene's research
group is working on analyzing plant compounds from Ghana for medicinal
properties.
It was Carr who first told
Sharlene about UAlbany’s Purple and Gold service organization. He encouraged
her to join the organic chemistry study group, and now she leads weekly
study groups as a tutor for General Chemistry 1 and 2, Physics 1 and 2
and sometimes organic chemistry. She is a biology major and computer science
and chemistry minor.
She is active in the Charles
Drew Science Club, the Golden Key National Honor Society, and is co-president
of the Presidential Honors Society.
It was also Carr who first
identified Michele’s potential for scholarly success when she won a Minority
High School Achievers award. “We’re very grateful to Dr. Carr for all of
his support over the years,” said Michele. “And for his guidance and mentoring,
too,” added Sharlene. “He was basically a mentor for all of us. He advised
us on how to study and how to use our spare time.” Alicia added, “He’s
always pushing us to do our best.”
Before Carr was there
to give the Persaud sisters that extra push, their mother, who works for
the state, was urging them to do their best through elementary, middle
and high school. Their father is also employed by state government.
“It was my mother who encouraged
us. She tells me to ‘Stay in the library and get your work done,’ ” said
Michele. “She always encouraged us to do our best in anything,” added Alicia.
For Alicia, that meant pursuing
an interest in computers. A freshman, she plans to have a double major
in computer science and business administration. “I've always liked computers.
I knew all along what I wanted to do,” she said.
Alicia’s goals include applying
to the School of Business and learning Web page design. She combines interest
in business with a talent for art, and has looked into the 5-year M.B.A.
program.
What's it like being in this
family of academic achievers?
“We're really close,” said Alicia. “My sisters
can help me with my classes. They advise me. They always have.”
Outside of school, Alicia
works for Sears Roebuck and Co. at Colonie Center. In her spare time, she
enjoys drawing cartoons. Soccer, bike riding and roller blading are recreational
activities all three of the sisters enjoy.
There is one more Persaud
sister at home. Marcia is an 11th grader at Albany High School. Whether
she enrolls at UAlbany remains to be seen, but since her three sisters
live at home, she is sure to have access to first-hand information about
the exceptional education available to her “just up the block.”
|
|
|
IN PRINT
Communication in the Presidential
Primaries:Candidates and the Media, 1912-2000
By Carol Olechowski
If one can say anything about the electoral process
during the past century, it's this, notes Kathleen E. Kendall: “In almost
every presidential primary, there have been candidates who have used brilliant
rhetorical strategies - and/or new technologies - to offset the power of
wealthier opponents and of the news media.”
Kendall drew this conclusion while researching her
latest book, Communication in the Presidential Primaries: Candidates and
the Media, 1912-2000. The Department of Communication associate professor
studied presidential primaries beginning with the 1912 campaign - the first
year in which such contests were widely held.
Communication in the Presidential Primaries has
its roots in a course Kendall taught at UAlbany in the 1980s. That course,
she explains, “got me more interested in presidential primaries,” so Kendall
and a colleague, Paul E. Corcoran of Australia's University of Adelaide,
embarked upon a research project focusing on the 1912 primary elections.
Based on their findings, the researchers collaborated on an article, “Communication
in the First Primaries: The ‘Voice of the People’ in 1912,” for Presidential
Studies Quarterly.
Kendall, an Oberlin College graduate who earned
her Ph.D. in speech and theatre at Indiana University, was still intrigued
by the topic of primaries, and continued her research. Using a “systematic
approach” of pinpointing, at 20-year intervals, “major primaries that were
contested,” she launched a study of how presidential contenders connected
with voters through advertising, speeches, and debates, and of how the
media covered the candidates.
In Communication in the Presidential Primaries,
Kendall presents the results of her research - which revealed “patterns
and trends and factors in common” in primaries throughout the 1900s. The
1912 primaries “established precedents for future elections,’ the author
writes. Theodore Roosevelt, “a popular former president, a self-styled
hero, and an internationally acclaimed man of peace and derring-do,” campaigned
against incumbent President William Howard Taft and Wisconsin Senator Robert
M. LaFollette, Sr., for the Republican nomination. The Democratic race
pitted New Jersey Governor Woodrow Wilson against Speaker of the House
of Representatives Beauchamp Clark of Missouri. On page 13, Kendall suggests
that “. . .presidential primaries served as vehicles for long-established
national party leaders in a struggle for power rather than as openings
for new candidates to emerge from a process of democratic selection to
express and represent interests previously suppressed by party organizations.”
The 1912 races, she adds, also introduced the presidential primary as “a
dramatically new situation: a contest of aspirants, including even the
president of the United States as a mere ‘candidate’ for the people's votes.”
Perhaps even more interesting, however, were the
ways in which those “aspirants” reached out to the public. In 1912, for
instance, “personal representatives” hit the campaign trail to make speeches
on behalf of some of the candidates. Among them were Louis Brandeis and
William Jennings Bryan, who made appearances to drum up support for LaFollette
and Wilson, respectively. In a scene oddly reminiscent of today's media
coverage, hordes of newspaper reporters followed the candidates, dutifully
filing reports each day on campaign speeches and rallies.
The candidates also found another use for newspapers:
advertising. Ads, which carried appeals from the political hopefuls and
endorsements from party officials, got their points across through the
use of boldfacing, font size, borders, and other graphic design elements.
Some were formatted to look like newspaper articles, and many carried instructions
about how to vote. Others were the forerunners of present-day “negative
ads.” Still others pointed out a particular candidate's worthiness to hold
the nation's highest office. Taft, for example, was extolled as a man of
“deeds - not words,” while Clark was portrayed as “fair” and “kind.”
Ensuing campaigns expanded communication venues
to include radio and television - and even direct mail appeals. Franklin
Roosevelt, in 1932, used the latter most effectively through the miracle
of 20th-century technology: The invention of the addressograph enabled
him to “send out wave after wave of mailings to Democratic party leaders
throughout the country,” according to Kendall. In turn, the politicians
would “write back and give FDR intelligence” about his prospects for a
successful campaign. Twenty years later, Dwight Eisenhower became the first
presidential aspirant to recognize the potential of television; he reached
the nation’s 19 million viewing households by purchasing airtime for both
ads and speeches. And in 1992, former California governor Jerry Brown established
another technological precedent by running an “800” number voters could
call to make contributions to his campaign. As a result of that strategy,
says Kendall, “he stayed in the race long after many other candidates had
dropped out.”
Kendall’s book also presents an engrossing look
at the impressions - both positive and negative - that advertising, news
coverage, and personal appearances have communicated to voters over the
years. “Reporters,” the author comments on page 165, “labeled the candidates,
based on personal observations, interviews with voters, talks with party
leaders, the language of the candidates, and polls.” In the 1972 campaign,
former New York City mayor John Lindsay was described as “charismatic,”
while Hubert Humphrey, who had served as vice president from 1963 through
1968, was deemed a “has-been.” Washington Senator Henry Jackson was seen
as a “hawk”; Senator George McGovern of South Dakota as a “compassionate
man of convictions”; and former Alabama governor George Wallace as “typically
jaunty” and “rustic.” Edmund Muskie, senator from Maine, went into the
campaign hailed as a “cool and controlled exponent of New England reserve
and restraint.” After he publicly broke down in tears when the Manchester
[New Hampshire] Union-Leader printed an article insulting to his wife,
however, “the media interpreted this event as a sign of weakness in character,”
writes Kendall, who has taught at UAlbany since 1964. And Richard Nixon,
already under suspicion for allegedly benefiting from a $400,000 corporate
donation to the Republican National Committee and for prolonging the Vietnam
war, was generally perceived as less than forthright. Nixon battled back
against his detractors, though, scheduling visits to the Soviet Union and
China to bolster his reputation as a statesman.
Communication in the Presidential Primaries concludes
with information about media portrayals of the candidates in the 1992 and
1996 presidential contests, and with some predictions about the 2000 primaries.
Kendall anticipates that emerging technologies will continue to have a
great influence on voter perceptions of the candidates. And she cautions
that, while “wealth can create the impression that no one else has a chance”
to win in the primaries, that isn't necessarily the case. “Having a huge
bankroll doesn't guarantee anyone's nomination,” she writes, citing the
failed campaigns of H. Ross Perot in 1992 and Steve Forbes in 1996, among
others, as evidence.
Kendall researched and wrote Communication in the
Presidential Primaries over an eight-year span - a much longer time period
than she had anticipated. To gather the information for the work, she read
candidates’ papers; watched videotaped advertisements, newsreels, and news
broadcasts; and read radio scripts and newspapers. A sabbatical leave and
a faculty research grant from the University at Albany made it possible
for Kendall to pursue her research. Other support came from the Shorenstein
Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University;
Kendall also received from Harvard a Goldsmith Award for Research in 1994
and a Research Fellowship for the Fall 1997 semester.
The writing process afforded her a rare opportunity
to work with a very gifted editor: her dad, 91-year-old Ronald B. Edgerton
of Florida. Kendall’s original draft was well over the 100,000-word limit
required, so she called upon the skills of the retired editor for Boston-based
textbook publisher Ginn & Co.
“He helped me cut the word count and polish the
book,” says Kendall, who dedicated the volume to her father and to her
mother, Alice King Edgerton, who passed away last fall. “It was a real
pleasure working with him!”
|
|
 |
Professor Frank G. Carrino Remembered
By Greta Petry
Professor Frank G. Carrino, 77, one of the first
two Collins Fellows at the University at Albany, died Monday, Jan. 24,
in Gaithersburg, Md. Carrino is remembered by his colleagues for his devotion
to the University, his generosity, his caring attention to students, and
his willingness to put others first.
“Frank Carrino had some of the most endearing qualities
you would want in a colleague,” said Professor Edna Acosta-Belen of the
Department of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. “He was dedicated to
his work and to his students; he was a loyal friend and a man of unquestionable
integrity; and his generosity had no parallel. He will always be missed.
We hope that we can continue the work he began in Latin American studies
almost half a century ago, for many years to come, and with the same degree
of enthusiasm and love for the profession.”
Carrino retired from the former Department of Hispanic
and Italian Studies in August 1991. Born in Lima, Ohio, he graduated from
Baldwin-Wallace College following World War II, received a master's degree
in modern languages from the University of Wisconsin, and a Ph.D. in modern
languages from the University of Michigan in 1956. He began his teaching
career at Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania and moved to UAlbany as an
assistant professor of Spanish in 1948. He became department chair in 1976.
During the late 1960s, he was named Director of Interamerican Affairs for
Paraguay and served for two years before returning to the University. “What
Frank represents to me most, more than any other faculty colleague I have
had for 27 years, is a sense of community,” said Professor Colbert Nepaulsingh
of the Department of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. “He joined the
University when it was small and downtown and he told me many stories about
how that old faculty interacted with each other as a family. Even after
the University expanded uptown, Frank always treated faculty members as
part of his extended family. He made no boasts about that. And he performed
quiet acts of kindness for everybody he met on campus.”
Professor Carlos E. Santiago, associate provost
and dean of graduate studies, said, “Frank Carrino always sought to put
the institution, department, faculty, and students first - his own concerns
and issues took a back seat to those of others. The care and respect with
which he treated distinguished professors such as Manuel Alvar was no different
from the way he treated everyone else.”
Santiago remembered Carrino as being “the
consummate gentleman. His smile, his humor, his attentiveness will always
be remembered. He will be missed by many.” Santiago credited Carrino with
being “a real builder of the Latin American studies program and department
at the University at Albany. His role as the department chair of the former
Department of Hispanic and Italian Studies was instrumental in attracting
top-notch scholars and building bridges with the fledgling Department of
Latin American and Caribbean Studies.”
Carrino helped establish the University’s first
interdisciplinary major in 1961, started the M.A. program in English as
a Second Language in 1966, the M.A. in Latin American studies in 1966,
and the University’s Study Abroad Program in 1967. He became an adjunct
professor of Puerto Rican, Latin American and Caribbean Studies in 1983.
Carrino and Helen Horowitz, associate professor of economics, were named
the first Collins Fellows in 1984.
He is survived by his wife of 50 years, Elnora;
and daughter, Constance (Jeffrey), who serves in the American Embassy in
Moscow. Memorials may be made to the Chapel of Divine Mercy, c/o Sacred
Heart Church, 260 Broad St., Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281. |
|