|

Yahoo.com!
Amazon.com! eBay.com! The flashy brand names of today’s dot-com
companies sound exciting, hip, and very “now.” Will they replace
traditional storefronts? Could you lose control of private information—even
your credit card—by shopping at a dot-com store? Now that an important
University-sponsored Internet conference has concluded, this is
a good time to re-examine the promises and the pitfalls of dot-com
shopping on the World Wide Web.
First,
consider the promise of easier shopping. Maybe I’m typical of many
on-line consumers. My first purchases were ages ago in web years—perhaps
two years. Books came first. Soon after came plane tickets and a
Dell computer. Then I bought stocks and mutual funds. In this past
year I bought a wonderful digital camera using a shopping-bot, an
on-line computerized advisor that matched my preferences to a specific
camera brand and on-line store. More recently I bought tires mounted
on wheels. (Never mind about the 16 wheel covers I accidentally
bought along with the wheels. They were easily returned for credit.)
Like millions of other dot-com shoppers, I think on-line shopping
sometimes trounces the off-line equivalent.
There’s
more: See how stylish clothes look on a computerized body shape
that resembles yours. Take steps toward finding and financing a
condo or a car. Beat local mortgage rates and order groceries all
in the same session. Saved a few bucks? Gamble with your money at
an on-line casino. Yes, there are new opportunities on line, but
all is not well in the land of bits and bytes.
There
are pitfalls to dot-com shopping. Did you buy toys for Christmas
presents? Many people received late deliveries. Have you found ordering
L.L. Bean goods by telephone faster than the World Wide Wait? Were
you unable to monitor your eBay auction? Denial-of-service raiders
have shut down popular web sites for hours at a time. So you thought
snowstorms and traffic were the only barriers on the way to shopping?
Worse
yet, some web security analysts say that they don’t use their credit
cards on line! Don’t worry about transactions on secure web pages
that display the little lock icon. The real danger is what happens
to your card number after the dot-com gets it. Lately, hackers have
taken to robbing second-tier on-line stores of their credit-card
transaction logs and posting them on the web for all to see. Is
there a danger? I think so. Evidently, to make sites consumer friendly
and to go live faster, some web designers have taken shortcuts on
security.
Unsettling
in a different way is the erosion of your privacy. Remember those
helpful hints, courtesy of Amazon.com, suggesting other books you
might like based on what you already purchased? Also, have you ever
noticed context-sensitive banner ads popping up when you visit certain
web sites? Behind the scenes, marketers are collecting information
on you and determining the best way to target your interests and
wallet. That’s why many web sites ask you to give personal information
as the price for site membership privileges.
Responsible
use of preference information helps make your web experience more
convenient. Unfortunately, there are few limits on what or how much
information is collected. For example, take companies like AOL-Time
Warner or Microsoft. These companies have many web sites and could
pool information about you from each site where you register or
visit. Their files on you could be enlarged by purchased demographic
and credit information. Other companies are trying to form alliances
to pool gathered information. Unfettered, the World Wide Watch is
a threat to our privacy.
Will
the Internet’s future be good for consumers? I think we will benefit
from new Internet brands joining trusted street brands, and our
options will grow. We will still enjoy flipping through magazines
on a rack and other hands-on shopping activity, of course, but maybe
less often. One leading pitfall is that our privacy will erode.
Although most web security holes will get plugged, I don’t think
the likes of Bill Gates/Microsoft will self-impose reasonable limits
to commerce-driven privacy invasions anytime soon.

|