The Journal for MultiMediaHistory
Volume 1 Number 1 ~ Fall 1998

 

The 1939 Dairy Farmers Union Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton, New York: The Story in Words and Pictures
Part II

Thomas J. Kriger

Part I
  •  Introduction

  •  Background

  • Part II
  •  The 1939 DFU Milk Strike

  •  Struggles in Words and Photographs

  • Part III
  •  Struggles to Close the Heuvelton Sheffield Farms Plant

  •  DFU's Struggle to Close Canton Milk Plants

  • Part IV
  •  Conclusion and Postscript

  •  Acknowledgements

  •  About the author

  •  Suggested Reading

  •  

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - women in the dairy strike.

    line.gif - 2332 Bytes

    The 1939 DFU Milk Strike

    In 1939, the DFU organized one of the largest and most successful milk strikes in New York State history. That year, the dairy industry was again thrown into turmoil following a federal court decision which declared unconstitutional New Deal regulatory controls enacted in the New York milkshed. After Federal District Court Judge Frank Cooper struck down the Federal Market Order system on February 21, which mandated the creation of bargaining agencies representing both milk producers and distributors, New York milk dealers slashed farm milk prices when freed from price control restrictions.[27]

    Strike meeting of DFU members in Watertown, N.Y., August 10, 1939.
    Strike meeting of DFU members in Watertown, N.Y.
    Source: Watertown Daily Times, August 10, 1939.
    In July 1939, the Supreme Court reinstated the Market Order system, but this occurred just as a midsummer drought scorched upstate New York, increasing the anger of already irate dairy producers. In August, DFU locals across the state met to discuss the implications of the dealers' actions. Two hundred DFU members met in Canton, New York, on August 3 and voted to strike unless they received a blended or average price of $2.35 cwt. The same day, two hundred more DFU farmers cast a similar vote in LaFargeville, New York, where they were joined by a large number of LaFargeville businessmen who pledged to support a DFU strike. Thirty-five DFU members voted to strike in Lowville, New York, followed by 130 farmers at the nearby Tritown DFU local (Antwerp, Evans Mills, Philadelphia). On August 10, the call for a strike reached a crescendo when six hundred DFU farmers in Canton voted unanimously to strike. Later that day, one thousand Jefferson County DFU farmers cast a similar vote in the South Jr. High Auditorium in Watertown.[28] On August 12, DFU farmers from northern New York joined representatives of DFU locals from the Mohawk and Hudson River Valleys, and from northern Pennsylvania and western Vermont, at a special convention. There, representatives of the union's 14,962 members voted to begin picketing and diverting milk in three days.

    DFU opponents were quick to attack the expanding strike movement. Charles Baldwin, executive secretary of the Milk Producers Bargaining Agency, raised charges similar to those made during the 1937 DFU strike. As the DFU strike began he declared that farm families were "guarding [their] homes tonight in fear of armed invaders."[29] He also stated that the DFU "is an out and out CIO Communist movement." New York State Health Commissioner John L. Rice reported the DFU strike "was insignificant after its first day." Henry Rathbun, vice-president of the Dairymen's League, declared that the DLCA was short only two percent of their normal deliveries; he attributed the shortages to "threats, intimidation and fear of CIO brutality."[30] The Watertown Times, however, estimated that the union had cut the New York City fluid milk supply by thirty percent after one day of picketing.[31]

    By the strike's third day, the DFU had tightened its grip on the New York City milk supply with only scattered incidents of violence. The union's ability to quickly accomplish this goal was due to two important factors. First, discontent ran so deep among the "rank and file" in 1939 that many farmers who were not DFU members joined the strike either by refusing to deliver their product or by arranging for DFU pickets to dump their milk. By citing the possibility of violence, for example, many league and Sheffield co-op member-farmers could contribute to the DFU strike movement and yet offer at least the appearance of trying to fulfill their contractual obligations. Second, sympathetic public opinion in the strike region and DFU allies such organized labor proved important in completing the union boycott of upstate milk plants. Union leaders such as the United Mine Workers' John L. Lewis sent telegrams of support, while the Transport Workers Union dispatched an organizer to help Archie Wright.[32]

    In the northern New York union stronghold of St. Lawrence County, DFU pickets quickly dried up most of the local plants that shipped milk to New York City—such as the Dairymen's League plant in Canton. Nevertheless, one important plant remained open: the Sheffield Farms plant in Heuvelton, New York, home of DFU Chairmen Archie Wright. The pictures that accompany this article were taken in Canton and Heuvelton during the DFU's historic struggle in 1939. Together they offer a compelling portrait of the desperation of the DFU's small farmer-members, as well as the depth of support for the DFU in local communities. One set of pictures was taken on the picket lines and streets surrounding the Sheffield Farms plant in Canton; the second set was taken in and around the nearby small town of Heuvelton, where after three days of unsuccessful picketing the DFU massed hundreds of its members and their supporters in one final effort to complete the union's blockade. The oral histories that accompany these pictures are the voices of actual participants. Some were DFU members and organizers; others were DFU opponents or members of the communities in which these strikes took place.

    Struggles in Words and Photographs

    The DFU's strategy in 1939 was to mass large crowds of union pickets and their supporters at the gates of local milk plants, hoping by their sheer numbers to dissuade non-striking farmers from attempting to deliver their milk. In Heuvelton, the crowds often numbered in the hundreds, which included DFU farmers, union supporters from local communities, and the many curious onlookers there simply for the excitement. (Notice the local police in the right foreground.)

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - Crowd Scene.

    Three Farmers Recall the 1939 Strike and the Dairy Farmers Union.
    Playing time: 3 minutes, 4 seconds.

    Farmer's recall 1939 strike:  14.4 kb/sec. 14.4 Kb/sec.
    Farmer's recall 1939 strike:  28.8 kb/sec. 28.8 Kb/sec.


     

    For the picketing to be successful, the DFU had to block every road leading to the targeted milk plants. In the next three pictures, DFU pickets in Canton try to persuade non-striking farmers from delivering their milk to the Sheffield Farms plant.

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - Crowd Scene. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - Crowd Scene. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - Crowd Scene.

     

    In the first of the following two photographs, four DFU farmers wait patiently while on picket duty near Heuvelton. The second photograph shows the outcome of their encounter with a non-striking farmer who was trying to sneak a few cans of milk into the Sheffield Farms plant by car.
     

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - picket duty. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - encounter with nonstriking farmer.


    The Spreading Strike.
    Playing time: 3 minutes, 26 seconds.

    The spreading strike:  14.4 kb/sec.14.4 Kb/sec. The spreading strike:  28.82 kb/sec. 28.8 Kb/sec.


    The DFU had greater success in closing the Sheffield Farms and Dairymen's League milk plants in Canton, primarily because Wright and the union were able to mobilize larger numbers of pickets for duty on Canton's wide, tree-lined streets.

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - pickets in Canton. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - pickets in Canton. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - pickets in Canton.

     

    In order to prevent angry non-strikers from simply crashing through their picket lines, DFU farmers often added an additional line of defense. These planks embedded with large nails were usually enough to stop even the most determined union opponent.
     

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - planks with nails to stop trucks. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - planks with nails to stop trucks.

     
    Another DFU tactic, which was borrowed from the CIO, was to organize "flying squadrons" of Union members who patrolled country roads in search of non-striking farmers attempting to deliver their milk. These road patrols usually consisted of a large stake-rack truck filled with DFU member-farmers.

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - flying squadrons. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - flying squadrons. 1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - flying squadrons.


    Enforcing the Strike: The "Flying Squadrons."
    Playing time: 1 minute, 28 seconds.

    Enforcing the strike: 14.4 kb/sec.14.4 Kb/sec. Enforcing the strike:  28.8 kb/sec.28.8 Kb/sec.

    Although it was denied by the DFU leadership, many DFU opponents (and even some DFU supporters) attributed the destruction of a local dairy barn to arson inspired by the picketing in Heuvelton. Many farmers believed the fire was set either in retaliation for attacks on DFU pickets, or as perhaps a warning to the few remaining farmers who persisted in delivering their milk.

     

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - burning dairy barn.


    Women played an essential role in the DFU effort, serving as union officers and, more importantly, as union pickets. The DFU Journal for 1939-1940 claimed that:

    Women in the Dairy Strike Women in the Dairy Strike
    A milk strike places an additional burden on every farm family, not only in the actual carrying on of the strike, but in doing the redoubled farm chores. It was upon the women that the burden of extra chores fell heaviest. While the men were busy doing picket duty, women did extra work around the farm. They milked more cows, they cranked the [cream] separator, they churned thousands of pounds of butter, some of it in electric washing machines, and they took over the duties normally carried on by the men. In addition, women helped materially on the picket line. Many a man kept his milk home because a women pleaded with him. All in all, the strike brought a greater feeling of camaraderie among farmers than has existed in a long time.[33]
     

    1939 DFU Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton - women in the dairy strike.
    While women had always played a critical role in farm strikes, the 1939 DFU strike marked the first large-scale picketing by women in a milk strike. Women pickets were often more effective in thwarting deliveries, perhaps because men were more deferential to women in public, or at least less apt to run them over if they blocked the highways. As more women got involved, the local press began to take notice. The Ogdensburg Journal, reporting on DFU picketing in the towns of Hammond and Heuvelton, noted that: "Women seemed to be just as active as the men here, as they were in Hammond and more than one officer's face turned crimson at the remarks tossed their way by the fairer sex."[34] Similarly, the Jefferson County Journal reported: "In the Adams area the strike has been very active right from the first day and much of the credit for its success locally is due the women who have been credited with turning back more milk than the men."[35]

    Go To:
    Dairy Strike: Part I
  •  Introduction

  •  Background
  • Dairy Strike: Part III
  •  Struggles to Close the Heuvelton Sheffield Farms Plant

  •  DFU's Struggle to Close Canton Milk Plants
  • Dairy Strike: Part II
  •  Return to top
  •  The 1939 DFU Milk Strike

  •  Struggles in Words and Photographs
  • Dairy Strike: Part IV
  •  Conclusion

  •  Postscript

  •  Acknowledgements

  •  About the Author

  •  Suggested Reading
  • line.gif - 2332 Bytes

    Notes for Part II:

    27. United States v. Rock Royal Co-op., Inc. et al, Federal Supp. 26 (Dist. Court, N.D. New York 1939). [Return to text]

    28. Watertown Daily Times, 10 August 1939, 3. [Return to text]

    29. New York Times, 16 August 1939, 25; 17 August, 1939, 42. [Return to text]

    30. New York Times, 15 August 1939, 1. [Return to text]

    31. Watertown Daily Times, 15 August 1939, 18. [Return to text]

    32. The Union Farmer, 25 September 1939, 1; Lowell K. Dyson, Red Harvest (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982), 172-3. [Return to text]

    33. Dairy Farmers Union Journal 1939-1940, 3. [Return to text]

    34. Ogdensburg Journal, 21 August 1939, 1. [Return to text]

    35. Jefferson County Journal, 23 August 1939, 1. [Return to text]

    line.gif - 2332 Bytes

    ~ End Part II~

    To: Part III
    The 1939 Dairy Farmers Union Milk Strike in Heuvelton and Canton, New York:
    The Story in Words and Pictures
    Copyright © 1998 by the Journal for MultiMedia History.
    Contents: JMMH, Volume 1 Number 1 ~ Fall 1998