| English Other Languages |
![]() |
|
|
Director: Daniel C. Levy |
| HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPHE Summary: In a unanimous judgment on August 12, 2005, the Supreme Court of India
declared that government, whether central or state, could not establish
quotas for any educational institution that operates on non-public funds.
The court further clarified its position that although the private professional
colleges are free to set their own admission policy, curricula and fee
structure, they cannot indulge in "profiteering." They can,
however, set aside 15 percent of their seats for Non Resident Indians
at higher costs to be able to subsidize the education of a few poorer
students. The court reconfirmed the unfettered right of the un-aided
professional institutions to choose their own students using transparent
and non-exploitative admission procedures
For the full story (shown with permission) see the Chronicle of
Higher Education, September 2, 2005, "In India, Quotas End
at Some Colleges," by Shailaja Neelakantan. http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=f5ab8xswhi5js2akddl2i49o2li1fkrv PROPHE Observation The Supreme Court's rulings reinforce the powerful judicial role
in Indian higher education, a role familiar in the U.S. but rarely elsewhere.
Taking the rulings together shows protection of private institutions from
government regulation (as with admissions policy) as well as a Court readiness
to intervene where it sees fit (as in what it sees as the illegitimate
pursuit of profit). Precedent for the ruling against quotas can be found
in the TM A Pai case, October 2002, and the Islamic Academic verdict,
August 14, 2003. The sole object of the fresh judgment is to free the
private professional colleges from the need to follow a quota policy providing
admissions to academically less desired students based on caste, region
or economic means. The courts' (including Supreme Court) major role regarding
volatile political debates over quotas for groups whose enrollments do
not match their population share is obviously a strong parallel to the
U.S. situation. It appears that quotas are more politically popular in
India than in the US. (For more on the Indian Court's rulings on alleged
profiteering, see prior PROPHE News Features.)
|
| Related Research Centers | |
|
|
|
||||
|
Program
for Research on Private Higher Education
(Financed by the FORD FOUNDATION, complemented by the University at Albany, SUNY) This website is best viewed by IE Browser 5.0 or above and Mozilla Foxfire. Last update Nov 26, 2008. All
rights are reserved. Please
contact PROPHE Webmaster
for any question or suggestion.
|
||||||