EnglishOther Languages
Contact UsSearch
UAlbany

Director: Daniel C. Levy

HOME PROPHE - A Program Dedicated to Building Knowledge about Private Higher Education Around the World
Site Map
About the Program
|
Staff & Partners
|
Publications
|
Data & Laws
|
Activities & Events

 

Indian Supreme Court Rules on Quotas and Profits

(Entry by Asha Gupta)

PROPHE Summary:

 
In a unanimous judgment on August 12, 2005, the Supreme Court of India declared that government, whether central or state, could not establish quotas for any educational institution that operates on non-public funds. The court further clarified its position that although the private professional colleges are free to set their own admission policy, curricula and fee structure, they cannot indulge in "profiteering." They can, however, set aside 15 percent of their seats for Non Resident Indians at higher costs to be able to subsidize the education of a few poorer students. The court reconfirmed the unfettered right of the un-aided professional institutions to choose their own students using transparent and non-exploitative admission procedures

For the full story (shown with permission) see the Chronicle of Higher Education, September 2, 2005, "In India, Quotas End at Some Colleges," by Shailaja Neelakantan. http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=f5ab8xswhi5js2akddl2i49o2li1fkrv

PROPHE Observation

The Supreme Court's rulings reinforce the powerful judicial role in Indian higher education, a role familiar in the U.S. but rarely elsewhere. Taking the rulings together shows protection of private institutions from government regulation (as with admissions policy) as well as a Court readiness to intervene where it sees fit (as in what it sees as the illegitimate pursuit of profit). Precedent for the ruling against quotas can be found in the TM A Pai case, October 2002, and the Islamic Academic verdict, August 14, 2003. The sole object of the fresh judgment is to free the private professional colleges from the need to follow a quota policy providing admissions to academically less desired students based on caste, region or economic means. The courts' (including Supreme Court) major role regarding volatile political debates over quotas for groups whose enrollments do not match their population share is obviously a strong parallel to the U.S. situation. It appears that quotas are more politically popular in India than in the US. (For more on the Indian Court's rulings on alleged profiteering, see prior PROPHE News Features.)

      Related Research Centers 
|
   Comparative Ed. & U. Albany
|
Applications    
Program for Research on Private Higher Education
(Financed by the FORD FOUNDATION, complemented by the University at Albany, SUNY)
This website is best viewed by IE Browser 5.0 or above and Mozilla Foxfire. Last update Nov 26, 2008.
All rights are reserved. Please contact PROPHE Webmaster for any question or suggestion.