Battista, R. Collier, G. Marschke,
Professor Messner reported that the joint working group with
The main item on today’s agenda is to consider inconsistencies between the MOU and the Faculty Bylaws and Senate Charter. The MOU explicitly states that this Council look into this matter and get faculty input. This came up at the Senate Executive Committee meeting Monday, and it was determined the Council should follow a two track approach: (1) to solicit input concerning the specific matter of inconsistencies surrounding the MOU immediately to be able to comply with the deadline in the resolution; and (2) to develop mechanisms to address more general issues during the course of the spring semester. The latter will likely involve a faculty survey and discussion at a faculty forum.
Any amendments to the Senate Charter must be submitted to the
The Council members agreed to distribute something to faculty as soon as possible requesting input and then review and vote on the Assessment Committees recommendations when more feedback is received.
Discussion on writing a memo to faculty ensued and the following was drafted:
FOR FACULTY INPUT: TENURE AND PROMOTION
PROCEDURES FOR THE
At the request of Interim
President Ryan, the University Senate has been considering the development of
governance structures for the
The resolution calls for the Governance Council to examine the Faculty Bylaws of UAlbany and the Senate Charter, and to solicit input from the faculty to determine if and what amendments would have to be proposed in order to remove potential inconsistencies between said documents and the MOU. The Assessment Committee of the Governance Council has made a preliminary examination of the issues and recommends to the Governance Council that in article SX 7.4. the text "the Provost, the dean" should be replaced by "the appropriate Vice President(s), the dean (where applicable)".
The Governance Council hereby invites the faculty to assist in identifying other possible inconsistencies between the documents under consideration and to report their findings and suggestions to the Governance Council. While we encourage faculty to carefully read the full MOU as a matter of information, the potentially critical items appear in section II.6. of the MOU. It is here that deviations from established "practices" concerning promotion and tenure have been stipulated. The specific question for which the Governance Council requests your input is whether the process detailed in II.6. is consistent with the written language of the Faculty Bylaws and the Senate Charter, and if not, to suggest amendment(s) that would remove such inconsistencies. Of course, any amendments ultimately proposed would have to be approved by the Senate and the Faculty, as applicable.
Faculty should be aware that the MOU only addresses procedures for CNSE, and consequently makes no (implied or otherwise) recommendations concerning other units of the university. A University Wide Ad-hoc Committee on Governance created by the Senate in Spring 2004 has recently submitted a draft report to the Senate that explores these complex issues in depth. The Senate plans to address the issues raised by the Ad Hoc Committee by surveying the faculty and holding a faculty forum, which has been tentatively scheduled for early March.
Please either reply directly to this email or send your comments to Prof. Steve Messner, Chair of the Governance Council, Arts and Sciences 351 (fax: 442-4936; firstname.lastname@example.org). In view of the time table specified in the 12/6/04 Senate Resolution, the Governance Council requests that you submit your input concerning the specific question identified above by * Friday, February 4, 2005. *
The Council will have the request mailed out by email broadcast to all voting faculty and responses from faculty will be directed to Professor Messner and discussed at the next Council meeting.
Jayne VanDenburgh, Recorder